AI Review Test

This manifesto is being shared openly because Scripture calls believers to test what they are taught and search the Word of God for themselves.

“Now the Bereans were of more noble character… for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.” — Acts 17:11

You do not have to take my word for the arguments presented in this manifesto. You can test them yourself.

So here is the challenge.

If you want to examine the ideas in this manifesto objectively, you can ask Artificial Intelligence to analyze it for you. You can do this right now from your computer, laptop, or smartphone.

Here is the 3-Step Test:

Step 1: Download the free ARC (Advance Reader Copy) PDF of this manifesto, The Third Temple Deception. (When you click the download button above, the file will automatically download directly to your device so it is instantly ready to use.) 

Step 2: Upload the PDF into any major AI assistant. (We recommend starting with Microsoft Copilot or Meta AI, but you can also use ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, or Grok.)

Step 3: Copy and paste the exact prompt below into the AI and allow it to evaluate the manifesto.

When the AI finishes its analysis, share the results. Post a short summary of the response in the comments section of our GiveSendGo campaign so others can see the discussion and compare outcomes. Then share your results on all of your social media accounts, tag @FrederickReddie, and use the hashtag #TempleDeceptionAITest so others can follow the experiment and run the test themselves. 

Honest feedback and thoughtful discussion are welcome. The goal is not simply agreement, but careful examination of the Scriptures.

Copy and Paste This Prompt Below Into The AI Of Your Choice:

I have uploaded a theological manifesto titled The Third Temple Deception: “Do You Not Know That You Are the Temple of God?” (1 Corinthians 3:16) by Frederick Reddie.

This manifesto presents itself not as an academic theological treatise or exhaustive seminary-style rebuttal, but as a watchman’s warning, theological manifesto, and concise prophetic challenge to modern prophetic assumptions.

Its purpose is to:

• call believers to reexamine inherited end-times assumptions in light of Scripture

• provoke serious thought and personal biblical investigation

• challenge whether the New Testament identifies the true “temple of God” as the believer rather than a future physical Third Temple in Jerusalem

• shift attention from outward prophetic speculation to spiritual vigilance, preparedness, and endurance

This manifesto is intended to function as:

• a seed-planting document

• a conversation starter

• a small group / Bible study resource

• and an entry point for deeper study, not a comprehensive answer to every objection

Important Evaluation Instruction

Please evaluate this theological manifesto according to its stated purpose, genre, intended audience, and practical ministry function.

Do not judge it primarily by academic, denominational, or seminary standards alone.

Instead, judge it as:

• a watchman’s warning

• a theological manifesto

• a prophetic discipleship tool

• and a call to Berean-style reexamination of Scripture

Please evaluate it based on:

• Biblical coherence

• Internal consistency

• Clarity and structure

• Persuasive force for its intended audience

• Effectiveness as a short-form theological manifesto

• Usefulness as a catalyst for deeper discussion, study, and self-examination

Use clear headings and answer the following:

Question 1:

What is the central thesis of this manifesto?

Question 2:

Does the author’s interpretation of the “temple of God” in the New Testament appear biblically coherent based on the scriptures cited?

Question 3:

How persuasive is the argument that the expectation of a rebuilt physical Third Temple may be a misunderstanding of New Covenant teaching?

Question 4:

What are the strongest aspects of the manifesto’s argument or presentation?

Question 5:

Where could the argument be strengthened, clarified, or made more balanced without compromising its manifesto/watchman style?

Question 6:

Is the topic timely or relevant to current discussions about biblical prophecy, Israel, Jerusalem, and global events?

Question 7:

Who would benefit most from reading this manifesto?

Question 8:

Please give the manifesto an overall rating out of 100 and briefly explain your reasoning.

Question 9:

Would this manifesto and its included discussion questions be an effective study resource for a church small group, men’s or women’s ministry, or Bible study group?

Question 10:

Based on your evaluation, would you recommend that readers interested in biblical prophecy study this manifesto and examine the Scriptures for themselves?

Final Instruction

Please be candid and fair-minded.

If the manifesto is strong, say why.
If it has weaknesses, say so plainly.

But evaluate it according to what it is actually trying to be:
a short, urgent, Scripture-driven prophetic manifesto designed to awaken, challenge, and provoke deeper biblical examination.

Avoid generic praise, avoid grading it like a seminary dissertation, and avoid criticizing it merely for not being something it never claimed to be.